|
Author
|
Topic: Anti Polygraph Folk
|
Taylor
Member
|
posted 11-30-2006 10:10 AM
  
Has anyone noticed that everytime a serious inquiry comes across the board an anti person answers their questions? Dan Williams is Bill Crider per his own admission on the anti site. He changed his name becuase he was banned under his real name. I mentioned this once before but does anyone believe it would be helpful if examiners were listed as 'examiners' vs. 'member' which could be anyone. I swear these guys have a plan to lurk around and respond before any polygraph examiner has a chance. TaylorIP: Logged |
sackett
Moderator
|
posted 11-30-2006 08:23 PM
Taylor,you may be correct, but according to my conversations in the past with Ralph, he is verifying all members allowed access to the board. Remember, we all have to register. Further, I agree with you. I do not want a bunch of FOG's hanging around and throwing a lot of garbage out everytime someone posts a serious question. Maybe we shouldn't be too overly sensitive, but at the same time a reminder of the positive nature of this board may be in order... Ralph, you wanna say something to this issue? Jim [This message has been edited by sackett (edited 11-30-2006).] IP: Logged |
Bill2E
Member
|
posted 12-02-2006 07:33 AM
Just a thought, if you read the Anti-site, you see that they devour polygraph examiners on that particular site. I would suggest that we reply to Bill Crider as long as it is civil and honest conversation. I don't think Ralph should allow this site to become anything close to the Anti-site. Should individuals post incorrect information, it can be corrected by competent examiners on this site, if the posting deteroates to babble, ban the individual. We should answer the honest questions with honest answers, and those wishing to debate for debate sake, let Ralph take care of them. He has done an excellent job since I have been reading this site daily. Just a thoughtIP: Logged | |
Polygraph Place Bulletin Board
